Todd Vogts

The Voice of the Vogts

Page 2 of 136

Talking Tech: Do I need multiple blogs and websites?

It’s interesting how little time it takes for a habit to be established. Since starting graduate school again, I have been consumed with reading journal articles, writing research papers, and chiming in on the class discussion boards. Now that the semester is over and I no longer have my course work hanging over my head, I feel like I have nothing to do.

Obviously, I have plenty to do with teaching and preparing for the new member of my family, but in two semesters of work I became so accustomed to having something to work on every waking, free moment of the day, I have found myself with something closely resembling free time.

It almost makes me uncomfortable, especially because it gives me a lot of time to think and dwell on things. Sometimes that is bad, but so far it hasn’t been terrible.

One topic my mind has been coming back to frequently, especially since I started to work on this blog more thanks to the lull between semesters, is the fact I have multiple blogs and websites, sometimes with accompanying, separate social media accounts. Sure, some websites I maintain and operate are for other people or specific business ventures I’m involved in, so those aren’t the ones I’m talking about. I’m talking about the handful that I keep updated that relate directly to me.

Here’s a quick list of the blogs and websites I’m talking about:

    • This is the one you are reading right now. I created it to take more control of my blog, which used to be hosted on the free version of WordPress. I also wanted a way to combine my blog with my presence as an author. The plan, though I haven’t done it yet, is to take down and point that domain at this site. After all, I already included all of my author information on here. Check it out, if you are so inclined.
    • Also, since this domain used to be my professional portfolio site, I moved all of that information here too. You can see any of it by navigating through the menu options of this site. However, I still haven’t moved a lot of my design work into this site . . . more on that below.
    • Basically, I wanted to make it a one-stop-shop. All of my social media presences (see a list of those here) even reference this site.
    • This one is for my life as a teacher. It gets updated the most. That’s because I post homework to it daily. I do so to eliminate any excuse my students might have about not knowing what we did any given day in class. I also post news stories about what my classes, specifically my journalism classes, are accomplishing.
    • Beyond all of that, though, I have set the site up to be a resource. I have information and what equate to syllabi for all of my classes on there. I also have information concerning Project Management, which is a curriculum I wrote for the state, on there so other educators can easily access it.
    • This website has its own dedicated Twitter account. That way, my students can follow the account on Twitter and get alerted every time I post homework (I have it set to auto-share any new post so I don’t have to worry about it), and it avoids them having to see all the other stuff I tweet about on my primary Twitter account.
    • This one was created as part of a class project during the Spring 2017 semester of my latest graduate degree. It’s actually part of I enjoyed posting to it, which I did on a weekly basis. Then, my professor suggested I keep it going as a resource for scholastic journalists and their advisers. I love that idea! I would love to make it into a MediaShift for high school journalism.
    • This is the website my wife and I share. We post pictures and insights into our lives. And when I say, “we,” I mean she. My wife updates it on a regular basis. I read what she writes. The arrangement works well.

Do I need all of them?

I don’t know. On one hand, the answer must be “yes” because why else would I have set them up. Of course, I could have set them up as the need for them arose, which I did. Perhaps, though, the necessity of all of these sites has passed. This is why I’m now trying to reevaluate it all and see if I still need them all.

Let’s pick off the low-hanging fruit first. The site is basically my wife’s. It’s a non-issue. I’m not even going to worry about it, except to read and enjoy the musings of my bride.

As for, I like the idea of growing it into more than a class project. I like that idea a lot. I could move it away from and establish it as a stand-alone site. It could be a tone of fun, and it could even be parlayed into more of a business venture (I’m thinking nonprofit arena, honestly). However, then I would be basically creating a fourth website. I would be going in a direction counter to the idea that I might have too many websites. This one needs more thought and planning . . .

The real crux of the issue seems to be the intersection of and They seem to be rather similar in nature. Both provide information about important aspects of my life. Both provide me a way to connect with others online. And both provide me a platform to write, which is important to my life.

However, the difference is the direction I am pointing my professional life. One site focuses on my desire to be an author and entrepreneur. The other focuses on my desire to be an academic. I love writing novels, which is why I have already published one and have two more completed and awaiting a publisher. I also enjoy being an entrepreneur. I can’t help myself. I struggle to pass up an opportunity to run a business of my own. When it comes to working in academia, though, that is clearly my primary focus at the moment. It’s the entire reason I’m working on this second master’s degree.

I clearly don’t want to give up the part of my life represented by, at least not yet. But I’m not serving myself well by keeping my attentions so fractured. I’m not saying I am going to stop taking part in any of my ventures any time soon, but I could at least start to get my online presence straightened out. Right?

So, I could set up a “personal” section on It could include my entrepreneurial endeavors. I could also include a section about me as an author. I could import this blog into that blog with some adjustments to keep everything organized. I could kill my Teacher Todd Twitter account and only use my primary Twitter account. Then I could point my domain to the website (as well as other domains I have pointed here and there).

Yeah. I could do all that. But, I have long been a believer of keeping different streams separate. I like to compartmentalize my activities, which is why I have so many email addresses and calendar. I want to keep things nice and orderly. My mantra has been, to quote Dr. Egon Spengler, “Don’t cross the streams.”

I still stand by that. So why am I even writing all of this? I don’t know. Maybe I truly have too much time to think. At the very least, though, writing this over the course of several days has helped me “talk” through everything.

So, if you’ve made it this far, you are too kind. If I were you, I probably would have given up around the time I got to the bullet points above. I am interested in what you think, though, so if you have any input, send it my way. The conclusion I have reached at this point is to leave well-enough alone for now. Perhaps once I am teaching at the university level, I might need to redirect everything to a new space entirely. That would probably make more sense than trying to Frankenstein two sites into one. However, I might decide having two separate spaces is the best idea too. Only time will tell.

I feel I’m doing something I often do, and that is get too far ahead of myself. I need to chill out and not feel like I have to streamline a part of my life that may not need streamlined just yet.

This was a long post to basically arrive back at where I started. Sorry about that. It did help me, though.

The Portfolio Comment

Oh, and you know how I mentioned something about needing to put my design work into I need to have a way to display all my work in one place. That is my goal, even if it might seem like a pointless endeavor to some. Well, I have some ideas about how to pull this off. Obviously I do more than just design. I take photos, write and produce multimedia content. All of that can pretty easily be displayed on the site without much trouble. However, designs (not website designs) made in software such as InDesign aren’t as easy displayed online without using a third-party solution. I have two in mind.

First, Adobe has a product called Behance, which is an online portfolio platform. I’m already a subscriber to the Adobe Creative Cloud, so that would be a natural fit, especially since I could automatically publish design from InDesign straight to my Behance site. Also, Behance is pretty cool. It is a community of designers and photographers. I can’t hold a candle to what they can do, but it would be neat to be rubbing cyber elbows with them. The downside would be this is another account and online presence to manage.  If I went this route, I would simply put a link to the Behance site on so anyone who is incredibly bored could check it out.

Second, there is a service called Issuu. It allows documents to be uploaded. Then those documents are turned into shareable and embeddable, digital pieces. It works great with sharing issues of my magazine and the magazine my students produce. As is the theme, I have a different accounts for different purposes. The one that would be most closely associated with, though, has no content on it whatsoever. I created the account to be able to follow other publications I was interested in, but I haven’t really used it up to its potential. If I used this service, I could just put a link to my account or I could actually embed each design into a page on my website.

So, again, I have used this post to think out loud. I think I will go with Issuu. Even though most of the design work I have done of late is part of my Teacher Todd life, I am still going to store it within the realm of That might constitute crossing streams, but my Issuu account tied to my teaching is used to story documents I want to share with my students and fellow educators. So I think I can justify it.


Again, if you have made it this far, you are truly a saint. You didn’t need to stick with it this far, but I’m glad you did. I would like to say my thoughts on these matters are closed, but I will probably revisit them in the future. At least this post allowed me to work through my thoughts. I thank you for indulging me a bit. You might feel you wasted your time, but this was very valuable for me. Thank you, and, seriously, let me know if you have any thoughts.

Getting a 2nd master’s degree with sights set on higher ed job

University of Missouri

This school year has been rough. My full-time gig as a high school journalism and English teacher hasn’t been bad, but I have been swamped by course work. This is because I am working on a second master’s degree. My first one is in education from Fort Hays State University. I got it because it moved me across the teaching pay scale. Other than that, it doesn’t do a whole lot for me. However, this second degree is in Media Management (journalism) from the University of Missouri, which is one of the best journalism schools in the country.

Obviously, a master’s degree in journalism is more up my alley. I love journalism. That’s why I became a teacher in the first place. It just makes more sense for me and my focus, and it allows me to better pursue my ultimate goal, which is to teach journalism at the college/university level.

Of course, a doctoral degree in journalism would allow for this too, and I almost went that route. I got accepted to the University of Kansas William Allen White Doctorate in Journalism and Mass Communication program a little more than a year ago. However, the timing wasn’t great, and I was unable to jump on the opportunity. Do I wish it had worked out differently? Sure, but that’s life. Besides, through the course of the interview for the program, I quickly felt I was underprepared to do the necessary research the doctoral program entailed. The kind folks at KU said I would be fine, but I wanted to be more than fine.

Hence my enrollment in the Mizzou program, which will culminate in me writing a thesis. That’s something I didn’t have to do through Fort Hays.

The thesis will give me great experience with conducting research, and the degree will make me qualified to teach journalism at the college/university level I aspire to be at. However, I don’t plan to stop at this master’s degree. I want to earn my doctorate. I want to be Dr. Todd Vogts, and I will be, one day.

As for the degree at hand, as of this writing, I am halfway done (most major assignments and other course work have been done for a week or more, actually, but I had one lingering final I had to take). I spent the Fall 2016 and Spring 2017 semesters killing myself with 9 graduate hours each. My beautiful and pregnant wife Kendall has been a grad school widow. I’ve experienced stress I am not used to, and I’ve often thought I couldn’t do it anymore. However, I am lucky enough to have a great supporter in my wife, and she has pushed me to keep working hard and has been gracious enough to proofread the hundreds of pages of papers I have written through the course of my classes. I don’t know what I would do without her.

This summer, I am taking 6 hours, which again is a pretty good load considering the summer classes are 8-week courses instead of the 16-week courses during the fall and spring semesters. Then, in Fall 2017, I will take 4 hours in order to wrap up a few classes before taking my 9-hour thesis in Spring 2018.

If all goes according to plan, I will be finishing up this time next year.

My students know I am working on this, and they know what my career goal is. I don’t look forward to the day when I say goodbye to them, but when that times come and I have secured a job at a college or university, farewells will have to be exchanged. They get it, though I’m sure when the day comes, the students won’t be particularly thrilled. In fact, I know that’s the case based upon another teacher in my building recently taking another job. As I’ve tried to explain to them, though, they can’t expect someone to stay forever. Change happens. People have to do what is best for them and their families. Besides, the students will, theoretically, be graduating and leaving one day too, so it is unfair for them to hold the teachers to a different standard. I understand where they are coming from. Change can be uncomfortable, but sometimes it can be a good thing.

So, I don’t know when I will get to move into the next level of teaching. Until it happens, I am just going to keep plugging away at my own self-improvement and the improvement of my students. And I will continue to do so with as much transparency as possible.

We’re having a baby girl!

Kendall and I posed for a quick picture after revealing the gender of our first child to be a girl. That’s why I’m holding a pink balloon and she’s holding a bow. The little outfit we are both holding is a baseball-themed onesie. No matter what, this girl will be a Cardinals fan!

OK. I know this might be old news for a lot of you. My wife Kendall and I started spreading the word about the fact we were expecting a while ago. And we revealed the gender on Easter via a Facebook Live video (I wanted to include that, but I can’t get it to download to my computer in order to share it on here). However, I still wanted to make a historical record of it on this blog.

Yes. I should have done so much sooner, but I’ve been swamped lately with grad school (stay tuned for another blog post soon about my reflections on that).

And, Kendall has already been covering the growth of our family pretty extensively on our blog at It’s quite humorous to read. You should check it out.

However, assuming perhaps some of you haven’t heard the news, we are having a baby girl this September. We did the reveal by having my brother shoot an arrow at a balloon filled with the appropriate colored confetti. It was windy, but he nailed it on the first try and the pink confetti flew.

This was a nice way for all the family to find out at once instead of having to make countless telephone calls. For my parents, this is their first grandchild, and they are pretty pumped. My brother often gets called “Uncle Troy” by the children of his friends, so he’s excited to actually be an uncle.

I’ve had a lot of people ask Kendall and I if I’m excited. I don’t show a whole of emotion, unless I’m screaming profanity at the TV while watching St. Louis Cardinals baseball. However, I am excited about having a daughter. I can’t wait to meet her and watch her grow into a beautiful young woman. Sure, it’s going to entail some changes in my world, but I’m good with that. It’s going to be challenging and exciting. I say bring it on!

Kendall has already started getting the nursery ready. She’s painting the walls a new color. I’m not much help in this department because I despise painting and don’t understand why we need to paint a wall that was freshly painted just about a year ago when we bought our house. But I’m just a dumb guy. What do I know about this sort of thing?

Oh, and during the sonogram where we confirmed the gender, she waved at us. She also flopped around a lot so we couldn’t get a good look at her face using the 3D sonogram feature. The wave was cool. The being difficult made it clear she is her mother’s daughter.

Another Kendall is coming into the world . . . Send good vibes my way if you feel so inclined.

REVIEW: ‘The Martian’ by Andy Weir

I’m late to the game, but I finally had the chance to read “The Martian” by Andy Weir,  and I loved it. From the opening lines of this 2011 science fiction tale written by a self-described space nerd, I was hooked and rocketing off into the world of the main character, Mark Watney.

Watney’s plight — stranded on Mars with no real hope of survival or rescue — was interesting, but it was the style of Weir’s writing that I loved. The prose were funny and light hearted, despite the subject matter being quite serious (just read the first lines of the book). There was some serious science packed into the fiction. All of the technology in the novel was modeled after real technology. The way Watney survived on Mars relied upon real science, which allowed him to, among other things, grow potatoes in the harsh conditions of the Red Planet. As an article from The Washington Post pointed out, Weir took extra steps to make his story realistic:

Weir developed a computer program to calculate all the orbital trajectories of the spacecraft in his story. He did his math meticulously, and “The Martian” is like an advertisement for the importance of STEM education. The story strives to be factually accurate, with one major exception: The thin atmosphere on Mars would make the novel’s early windstorm much less destructive, indeed rather feeble. Weir said he decided to overlook that fact purely for dramatic purposes.

Weir was able to make such a computer program because he was a computer programmer before he became a full-time author thanks to the success of his literary debut.

Of course, the science wasn’t the only thing relating to real life. In one interview, Weir said his main character’s personality was based upon his own. Watney was a smart aleck who took the lemons of what was basically a death sentence and made lemonade. He took everything in stride . He never gave up, even when he knew it was unlikely he would survive and had no viable communication method with Earth. He was the type of guy that would be fun to just hang out with. He was, and I can’t stress this enough, funny (seriously, read the first lines of the book). I read a lot, and I haven’t come across many characters that were this funny and yet this smart.

I would recommend this book to anyone who is looking for a fun, science fiction story that is scientifically accurate. There is some adult language, but it fits the character so well that it doesn’t distract from the story. And, at the risk of giving away the ending, the story does conclude happily, so don’t skip this book if you are worried about it ending with a dead body somewhere out in the cosmos.

Besides how much I enjoyed it, how it came to be a bestseller is even more intriguing to me. Weir first wrote it as a serial on his blog. His readers enjoyed it, and he eventually put it up for sale on Amazon. That’s when things took off. He quickly got a book deal and a movie deal, and the rest, as they say, is history. He even has another book in the works.

As an author myself, I admit I’m a bit jealous of how his success came to be, but I’m not so jealous as to be bitter. If anything, I am inspired to keep writing and working on my craft. He gives me hope that one day I too can see success with my writing, even if it isn’t to the same level as he has seen.

Oh, and I mentioned a movie deal. I made myself wait to watch  the movie until I had read the book, and I’m glad I did. The movie was just as good as the book, but it had to drop and condense parts for the sake of brevity on the big screen. Also, the ending of the book and movie is vastly different. The movie takes the story a step further than the book. It makes sense to give the movie more closure, but I thought the book ended at just the right spot.

Now, if you haven’t already, go read this book! You won’t be disappointed.

‘The Girl on the Train’ shows darker side of suburbia

girlontrainposterThe mystery genre is full of stories capitalizing on the words of unreliable witnesses to crimes. “The Girl on the the Train” puts a different spin on this concept by having the main character be an alcoholic who often wants to be a witness but can’t remember if she actually saw anything or not.

Rachel Watson (played be Emily Blunt) misses her idyllic life married to Tom Watson (played by Justin Theroux). But that’s gone. He’s remarried to Anna Watson (played by Rebecca Ferguson), and the two have a child together. Rachel spends her days riding the train into town from her suburban home while sipping vodka in order to keep the shakes and memories at bay.

On these train rides, going to an imaginary job to keep her roommate content about her ability to continue to pay rent, Rachel imagines what life could have been by staring out at the rows of houses along the train tracks. Her former home is there, along with her ex-husband and his new wife. A couple houses down is the home of the ideal couple. Rachel gives them names and imagines how their lives are progressing. She becomes close, even intimate, with them without ever meeting them for real.

That perfect couple in Rachel’s eyes is actually Scott and Megan Hipwell (played by Luke Evans and Haley Bennett), and Megan goes missing. Rachel is an obvious suspect because she is often seen in the neighborhood while being drunk because of her hobby harassing Tom and Anna. Rachel doesn’t think she could ever hurt someone she considers a friend, but, the night of Megan’s disappearance, Rachel was in rare form. She remembers nothing except she woke up bloodied and dirty.

This sets off a series of events in which Rachel attempts to remember. Along the way she lies her way into quasi-friendship with the prime suspect, attends therapy sessions for dubious reasons, alienates her roommate and makes a new ally, all culminating in surprise revelations about Megan and several others.

“Girl” proves to be a slowly opening flower. Each new development leads to the next until everything is exposed. The twists are turns are fun, and even when you think you might have it figured out, you can’t be sure until the end when everything starts to fall into place.

This movie isn’t a masterpiece by any means. It is just a good bit of entertainment based upon a wildly successful novel of the same name by Paula Hawkins. I had read the novel months prior, and I enjoyed it. It drug on in a few places, but it truly built up the suspenseful twist ending. The movie does an OK job of this. The format allows for the slower parts of the book to sped up, but the movie did seem to rush the suspense toward the end.

None of the characters are likable. However, as the story begins to progress, you do feel a bit of sympathy for a few of them. For me, this was particularly the case when it came to Rachel and Megan.

One glaring difference between the book and the movie was the setting. The book was set in England, but the book was set in New York. I don’t know why this change had to be made, but it worked well enough because the point isn’t the setting. The point is how nothing is at it seems.

The book came out in January 2015, following the success of the June 2012 bestseller by Gillian Flynn, “Gone Girl”. These two mystery stories are undoubtedly going to be compared, and it makes sense. Both have leading female characters, and both highlight how even if people seem perfect on the surface, the truth is usually vastly different. However, you can’t compare them directly.

“The Girl on the Train” focuses on Rachel’s life spiraling out of control and her inability to remember what happened, even though she knows deep down she was present at Megan’s disappearance. She doesn’t know if she was involved or not. In “Gone Girl,” the story centers on a marriage in trouble and only the victim truly knows what happened. Similar, but these are key differences that cast an entirely different light on the situation.

“The Girl on the Train” is rated R for its language, nudity and adult situations. It has a runtime of 1 hour, 45 minutes. It isn’t a family movie, but it would make a great date-night flick. This is one psychological thriller you should see. Just sit back and enjoy the ride.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2017 Todd Vogts

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑